Comparable Companies Analysis (Comps)
Comps answers 'what are similar public companies trading at?' and applies those multiples to value your target. It's the fastest and most market-grounded valuation approach.
Definition
Comparable companies analysis (comps) is a relative valuation method that values a company by comparing its financial metrics and trading multiples to those of similar publicly traded companies. It is one of the three core valuation methodologies alongside DCF and precedent transactions.
How to Run a Comps Analysis
Four steps from peer selection to implied valuation
Selecting Comparable Companies
Not all peers are created equal
Industry
Same sector and business model
Size
Similar revenue or market cap
Geography
Comparable market exposure
Growth
Similar growth profile
Different industry (fintech)
Too large (10x the target)
Primarily Asia-Pacific exposure
EV/EBITDA Multiples Range
Where the peer set trades, and what it implies for the target
Implied Valuation
Target EBITDA of $140M x 9.0x median multiple = $1260M
Selecting the Peer Group
The peer group should include companies with similar business models, end markets, size, growth profiles, and margin structures. Start broad (same industry) then narrow based on revenue mix, geography, and growth rate. A typical comp set has 6–12 companies. The quality of your comps analysis depends entirely on peer selection — garbage in, garbage out.
Key Multiples Used
The most common multiples are EV/EBITDA, EV/Revenue, and P/E. EV-based multiples are preferred because they are capital-structure-neutral. For high-growth companies with negative EBITDA, EV/Revenue is used instead. Industry-specific multiples also matter — EV/EBITDAR for airlines, Price/FFO for REITs, Price/Book for banks. Always use forward (NTM) multiples when available as they reflect expectations.
Calculating the Implied Valuation
Spread the peer multiples (mean, median, 25th/75th percentile), then apply the relevant range to your target's financial metrics. For example, if the median peer EV/EBITDA is 10x and your target has $100M EBITDA, the implied enterprise value is $1B. Subtract net debt to get equity value. Present a range, not a point estimate. Comps are typically shown alongside DCF and precedent transactions in a football field chart.
Worked Example — With Real Numbers
You are valuing a SaaS company with $200M revenue growing 25% YoY. You select 8 public SaaS peers trading at 8x–14x NTM EV/Revenue (median 11x). Applying the range: low = $200M × 8x = $1.6B, mid = $200M × 11x = $2.2B, high = $200M × 14x = $2.8B. The implied EV range is $1.6B–$2.8B.
Key Takeaways
Comps reflect real-time market sentiment — they move with the market
Peer selection is the most subjective and most important step
Always use forward multiples when available for better accuracy
Comps provide a floor/ceiling check for DCF-based valuations
Common Mistakes in Interviews
Using too broad a peer group that includes companies with different growth or margin profiles
Relying on trailing multiples instead of forward (NTM) multiples
Forgetting to calendarize financial data when companies have different fiscal year-ends
How Interviewers Test This
Be ready to walk through the full comps process: select peers, spread multiples, apply to target. A common follow-up: 'Why might your target trade at a premium or discount to comps?' — answer with growth, margins, or market position.
Related Concepts
Directly referenced in this topic
EV/EBITDA Multiple
EV/EBITDA is a valuation multiple that compares a company's [enterprise value](h...
Enterprise Value
Enterprise Value (EV) represents the total value of a company's operating busine...
Precedent Transactions Analysis
Precedent transactions analysis is a relative valuation method that values a com...
Price-to-Earnings (P/E) Ratio
The Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratio is the most widely recognized equity valuation...
More Valuation
53 more concepts in this category
Related Articles
DCF vs Comps vs Precedent Transactions: When to Use Each Valuation Method
Compare the three core valuation methods: DCF, comparable companies, and precedent transactions. Learn when to use each and how they work together.
Comparable Company Analysis: Complete Guide to Trading Comps
Master comparable company analysis (trading comps) for finance interviews. Learn how to select comps, spread comps, and normalize metrics step by step.
Topic Guides
Firms That Test This
Related Articles
DCF vs Comps vs Precedent Transactions: When to Use Each Valuation Method
Compare the three core valuation methods: DCF, comparable companies, and precedent transactions. Learn when to use each and how they work together.
Read articleComparable Company Analysis: Complete Guide to Trading Comps
Master comparable company analysis (trading comps) for finance interviews. Learn how to select comps, spread comps, and normalize metrics step by step.
Read articlePractice Comparable Companies Analysis (Comps) questions
400+ interview questions with AI feedback. Free to start.
Start PracticingMaster Comparable Companies Analysis (Comps) and 100+ More Concepts
Get the full IB Flash experience and walk into your interview with confidence.
AI Interview Coach
Real-time feedback on your answers
1,000+ Practice Questions
Across IB, PE, HF, VC & more
Financial Modeling Tests
Excel-based skill assessments
Or explore our free tools to get started