Skip to main content

    What's a Recent Deal You Followed?

    Pick one recent M&A deal (ideally in a sector or with a bank you care about), and be ready to cover: the buyer and target, the strategic rationale, deal value and the multiple paid, how it was financed (cash/stock/debt), expected synergies, and your own view on whether it made sense. The differentiator is having a thoughtful opinion, not just reciting facts.

    Definition

    This question tests genuine interest in finance and your ability to think like a banker rather than recite headlines. The interviewer wants to hear a specific recent M&A deal, who the parties were, the strategic rationale, the price/multiple, how it was financed, and — crucially — your own informed opinion on whether it was a good deal. The headline: pick one deal, know it cold, and be able to discuss the rationale and valuation, not just the names.

    What the interviewer is actually testing

    Three things: (1) Do you actually read about markets, or did you cram a list? (2) Can you explain why a deal happened — the strategic and financial logic — not just what happened? (3) Can you form and defend an opinion? Reciting a press release is a fail; connecting the rationale to valuation and offering a view is a pass. It also doubles as a 'why banking' signal: caring about deals shows the interest is real.

    The structure of a strong answer

    Cover these in order: 1) The deal — '[Acquirer] is acquiring [Target] for ~$Xbn, announced [month].' 2) Rationale — why the acquirer did it (market expansion, vertical integration, synergies, defensive consolidation, acquiring tech/talent). 3) Valuation — the price and the multiple (e.g., '~14x EV/EBITDA, a ~25% premium to the unaffected price'). 4) Financing — cash, stock, or debt, and what that implies. 5) Your view — was the premium justified? Is it accretive or dilutive? Any regulatory/antitrust risk?

    How to pick a deal

    Choose a deal that is: recent (last 6-12 months), large/well-covered (so info is available and the interviewer knows it), and ideally relevant to the group or bank you're interviewing with — pitching a tech deal to a tech team, or a deal the bank advised on, shows preparation. Avoid deals so old they feel stale, deals you only half-understand, or anything you can't discuss past the headline.

    Show financial depth

    Elevate the answer with real banking concepts: the multiple paid vs. precedent transactions, the premium to the unaffected share price, whether it's accretive/dilutive in a stock deal, the pro forma leverage if debt-financed, and regulatory risk (antitrust review, likelihood of closing). Even one or two of these moves you from 'reads the news' to 'thinks like a banker.'

    Prepare for follow-ups

    Expect: 'Was it a good deal?', 'Why did the stock move on the announcement?', 'How would you value the target?', 'Cash or stock — and why does it matter?', 'Do you think it closes?' Have a defensible opinion. If they push back, it's fine to engage — they want to see you reason, not just agree. Prepare 2-3 deals so you're not stuck if they've already discussed your first pick.

    Worked Example — With Real Numbers

    "A deal I've been following is [Acquirer]'s ~$28bn acquisition of [Target], announced earlier this year. The rationale is consolidation — the acquirer wanted [Target]'s recurring software revenue to offset its slower legacy hardware business, plus cross-sell synergies estimated at ~$1bn annually. They paid roughly 16x forward EV/EBITDA, about a 30% premium to the unaffected price, which is rich but in line with recent precedent transactions in the space. It's a cash-and-stock deal, with about $15bn of new debt, pushing pro forma leverage to ~3.5x. My view: the strategic logic is sound and the recurring revenue is worth paying up for, but 16x is aggressive, so the synergies have to materialize for it to be accretive by year two. The main overhang is antitrust review given their overlap, which is why the target still trades below the offer price."

    Key Takeaways

    1

    Pick one recent, large, well-covered deal relevant to the group you're interviewing with

    2

    Cover parties, rationale, multiple, premium, and financing — then give your own view

    3

    Reciting headlines fails; explaining the strategic and financial logic passes

    4

    Show depth with multiples, premium, accretion/dilution, leverage, and regulatory risk

    5

    Prepare 2-3 deals and a defensible opinion for follow-ups

    Common Mistakes in Interviews

    Reciting the headline with no rationale, multiple, or opinion

    Picking a deal you only know superficially and crumbling on follow-ups

    Not knowing the price, premium, or how it was financed

    Choosing a stale deal or one irrelevant to the bank/group

    Refusing to take a view when asked 'was it a good deal?'

    How Interviewers Test This

    Have an actual opinion and be ready to defend it — 'I think they overpaid because...' is far stronger than reciting the deal value. Know the multiple and the premium; those two numbers signal you understand valuation, not just the news. Tie the deal to the bank's sector coverage when you can — it doubles as a 'why this group' signal.

    Related Concepts

    Directly referenced in this topic

    More Investment Banking

    30 more concepts in this category

    Topic Guides

    Firms That Test This

    Practice What's a Recent Deal You Followed? questions

    400+ interview questions with AI feedback. Free to start.

    Start Practicing

    Master What's a Recent Deal You Followed? and 100+ More Concepts

    Get the full IB Flash experience and walk into your interview with confidence.

    AI Interview Coach

    Real-time feedback on your answers

    1,000+ Practice Questions

    Across IB, PE, HF, VC & more

    Financial Modeling Tests

    Excel-based skill assessments

    Start Free Trial

    Or explore our free tools to get started